Talk:Orphism (art)

New category
I've added a new subcategory, Orphism, to the Modern Art category, since although it is rooted in cubism, it can be regarded as separate. I hope this is acceptable. Matve 08:55, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Revised and restructured article
Revised and restructured much of the article, added images and new texts with references. Before, this article was primarily based on Apollinaire and the Delaunay's. Now the article has been expanded to include other artists associated with Orphism (such as Kupka). The section entitled History now explains the origin of the term Orphism. This article was reworked in the Sandbox area for convenience, then transfered to the main article. Hopefully, now, the viewer will have a better understanding of Orphism and its relation to Symbolism, Neo-Impressionism, Fauvism, Cubism and Abstract art in general. Note: much of the original article, some sections sourced and some section not, remains intact. Coldcreation (talk) 19:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.)&#32;Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20101201085654/http://www.moma.org/collection/theme.php?theme_id=10142. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 19:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Revised and removed
At Talk:Orphism (art)/Temp there is a new version with modified and removed text from MoMA. Coldcreation (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)