Talk:Orton-Gillingham

Copyright review.
A series of edits added material from this site word for word. I reverted to the version prior to those edits.

The headings in the feature section still largely match, but the wording is not a copy paste.

I rev-deled the intervening versions.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  16:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Article needs rewrite
Looking at sources cited, I find publications by IMSE and other groups that sell Orton-Gillingham training, or redlinks. This article should instead rely on research concerning the efficacy of this method, e.g. on Google Scholar. It was not enthusiastic: "Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established." HouseOfChange (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)