Talk:Oskar Schindler/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * I've read this through, verified the references, and checked the image copyright status. I find the article is comprehensive, very well written and thoroughly referenced, and meets all GA standards. Excellent work! - Lemurbaby (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Good gravy. This is my first one to pass without needing any tweeks. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)