Talk:Oskar Vogt

superfluous
Why not just get rid of this article altogether. What's the process for getting a page deleted? This one seems like a worthwhile candidate, the individual is not notable and there is so little information in the public domain about him. Bubuntu 21:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I definitely disagree! He was a very notable scientist at his time and he did a lot for neuroscience! I'm working on the article now. static shakedown 18:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup
This page needs to be cleaned up and almost entirely rewritten. It also needs to split into two separate articles, one for Cecile Vogt-Mugnier (that page redirects here) and one for Oskar Vogt (currently that page redirects here also). Named as it is, it violates dozens of Wikipedia naming conventions. It also shouldn't use top-level sections, i.e. =Big Title=. Top-level sections should never be used (the fact that the Wiki software allows it is another issue). The top-most sections should always be second order, e.g. ==Smaller title==. I'll try to address some of these issues myself, but since I'm not an expert on the subject matter, it may take a while. &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 17:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, I took a stab at it, but since I am so unfamiliar with the subject, it still looks (and reads) very poorly. It needs someone with a good understanding of the subject matter to whack it into shape. &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 17:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Which member of the Krupp famoly supported Vogt? Who is this Fritz Krupp? There had been a Friedrich Krupp, but he died 1826. In 1937, there had been Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach. --Siffler 18:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Cleaned up and referenced. FeatherPluma (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)