Talk:Oslo Metro/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the review.
 * 1a) Done (hope I catched them all).
 * 1b) Done.
 * 2a) Please correct me if I am wrong, but all the books use cite book. Everything else is a website or a report.
 * If it is, then wouldn't this be referencing a book source ---> ? If not, then that's my bad in that part. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There are two sections to the referencing: the inline part in under "notes" (that thus transcludes the reflist) and the second section is "references" that references all two books used (which uses cite book. This is inline with WP:CITE—actually, it is how WP:CITE is cited ;) Arsenikk (talk)  19:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2b) The book is built up thematically instead of chronologically—and focuses on the tramway rather than the T-bane. So yes, this is all from one page in the book. But it was still a good question. Arsenikk (talk)  23:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was always taught that is a good idea to ask questions. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I would like to thank Arsenikk for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, because I have gone off and passed it to GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)