Talk:Osteopathic medicine

Problems
Note sure OMM should be stuck in the USA section. The description of it is out-of-sync with our main OMM article and the medical sourcing poor, giving a POV slant too. Alexbrn talk 17:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

It appears that you're combining the "American" and "Canadian" osteopathic medicine pages in hopes of making a more cohesive page. I think you should put a few more sentences in your first section before you get to your "United States" section because at the moment, it just feels like a summary of the already existing United States and Canada pages. If you put a little more content in that fist section before "United States" it would feel more like its own page. Alexstrom14 (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Should be either renamed to 'Osteopathic Medicine in North America' or removed/content transferred to another articles, since the terms 'Osteopathy' and 'Osteopathic medicine' are used interchangeably in Europe in academic settings (with bachelor's and master's degrees awarded in Osteopathic Medicine) and in practice, so the discussion in this article does not reflect the situation in the World. --Reijonathan (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is a big problem. This is not just USA and Canada. This is a a lot of countries - see here. These two pages on exactly same subject just should be merged. I suggested it here. My very best wishes (talk) 19:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)