Talk:Otto Becher/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. As expected, the standard of prose and referencing was very high. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I'd be interested in more information on Napier ' s service in the Mediterranean in 1941: do you have any available?--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, I should be able to access further information in the Official Australian History and add some more in. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the review, mate, I appreciate it. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)