Talk:Ouï FM

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was No consensus - Page Not Moved, also note that no one has suggested how a UK/US/AU/etc keyboard (since this is English Wikipedia) will easily generate an ï character (even the French know best - the website is at www.ouifm.fr)  Ron h jones (Talk) 02:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Oui FM → Ouï FM — Mistake in the radio's name. — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 19:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose, as current name is in english form. GoodDay (talk) 01:11, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is the official name, you can see the fr.wikipedia and the official website : http://www.ouifm.fr/ — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 11:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's the French Wikipedia, this is the English Wikipedia. GoodDay (talk) 16:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Baseless. Arbitrary diacritic stripping does not automatically give an "English form". Knepflerle (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose. In English, ï = i.  81.111.114.131 (talk) 16:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * " In English, ï = i." - bizarre, and completely wrong. Knepflerle (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Support I don't get it, how is the current name the English form? "Oui" and "Ouï" are both as equally French as each other. WP:UE says if there is no established English name, then we use the common French name. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd like to see how this radio station is referred to in English, but the request seems sensible on the face. Knepflerle (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

In case anyone was in any doubt of the stylistic nature of the dots, in the logo they appear above the U. FWIW, English is diacritic-agnostic - there exist no words in the modern where the addition or omission of a diacritic produce a new word (naïveté is a loanword). Therefore Knepflerle's statement is the only thing "bizarre, and completely wrong" here. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)