Talk:Oudin coil

New material without sources
User:JColedan, User:K Stress, User:Sorjing, and User:Jericcarobison seem to be Oudin-coil-specific WP:SPAs, as they are new editors who have been pumping up this article with unsourced details. Some of these details might be worth including, if they could be contextualized and backed up by sources. The detail of seven turns in the primary, for example, must be some particular Oudin coil, not a general property of Oudin coils. I invite one of more of them to please explain here what's going on, and where this material is coming from, so we can do something more constructive than just reverting them. Dicklyon (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with all of the above. This stuff is confused, disorganized, amateurishly written, unsourced, with a lot of errors.  There are plenty of old books on Google Books which describe Oudin coils. -- Chetvorno TALK 05:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Rewrite
Inspired by the above, completely rewrote and expanded article, with proper sources.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Oudin coil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050404182727/http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk:80/~kskeldon/PubSci/ to http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~kskeldon/PubSci/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)