Talk:Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc.

Lilylolo's Feedback on Article:
I thought you did a great job on your article, and hit on every requirement on the 15-point checklist. I did not see any major changes that need to be made. Some minor suggestions include:


 * (1) I'm not sure whether phrases like " service providers can rest easier" and "oddly parallel" are neutral statements or opinions (see checklist #6). Perhaps you could put it in a separate, "Significance" section at the end of the Article.


 * (2) The sentence "Judges give a plaintiff in a proceeding without a lawyer the benefit of the doubt", should be in past tense, in accordance with the rest of the verb tense of your article.


 * (3) For better flow/ transition, perhaps have a short sentence after "Judges give a plaintiff in a proceeding without a lawyer the benefit of the doubt,[10] but the plaintiff must still have a valid underlying cause of action." saying that the plaintiff in this case could not show a cause of action under the DMCA or the ADA.


 * (4) In the "External Links" section, is the Magistrate's findings also available on Lexis?

Lilylolo (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Lilylolo, 5/3/2012

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)