Talk:Ousmane Sow

Referencing system
I plan to work on this article now that it has survived AfD. I'd also like to improve the references, add citations and so on. Would anyone object if I changed the referencing system to list-defined at the same time? I'll probably do so in a day or two if no-one minds. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * No objection. Is there a template that can be placed at the top of the article, like Use dmy dates, that will indicate the citation referencing system to editors, but not show up in the text? --Bejnar (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, there's use list-defined references. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Justlettersandnumbers: I really don't like that system. I guess I am not used to it. I am finding it very confusing and discouraging. I would like to expand the article to get it approved for RD, but I am very put off by this. Who thought it was a good idea to invent this system? Why do you prefer it to the other/more traditional system?Zigzig20s (talk) 09:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Er, which bit? You don't like the references being collected in the References section, or you don't like the r template for citations? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I like this. It's what's most commonly used. I am growing discouraged that this won't end up in RD because we are dispirited by the reference formatting.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * A disagreement over reference style shouldn't be allowed to discourage editing (though it often does). Why don't you just go ahead and make the edits you want to make? I'll probably then tidy up the references once you are done, if you don't mind? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Additional sources
Here are some additional sources that might prove useful in expanding the article: --Bejnar (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Tertiary source, three pages, requires a subscription,
 * Tertiary source, three pages, requires a subscription,
 * Tertiary source, three pages, requires a subscription,
 * Tertiary source, three pages, requires a subscription,
 * Thank you, ! Do you have access to the Encyclopaedia Universalis? If so, would you very kindly email me the text of that article? I'd be grateful. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I do not, as my reading French is poor. I asked my francophone friend but she did not either. The cited article by Hoet (2008) has a lot of text, I did not read all of it. --Bejnar (talk) 22:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Pictures of his sculptures
Is it possible to upload at least one picture of a sculpture, possibly in fair use please?Zigzig20s (talk) 05:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Section titles
It is hard to believe possible, but seems to think the section titles I had used here need to be "standardised", and what's more thinks it important enough to edit-war over. I don't agree on either count. I had entitled a section on Sow's life "Life" (it wasn't just about his early life), and section on his work, "Work". If there's any policy or guideline that forbids the use of such titles, please go ahead and cite it here. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Can we please follow the chronological order as we usually do? "early life", "career", "personal life and death", seems to be fairly standard.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * What exactly is wrong with Life … Work … Death? It seems quite chronological to me. There'll need to be a Reception section, too, of course. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3337667.pdf (subscription required). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)