Talk:Ove Almborn/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 01:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 08:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * What degree?
 * B.A., added. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Commendable is a little unencyclopedic
 * Trimmed. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Link "Swedish Natural Science Research Council"
 * The organisation no longer exists by that name, so I inter-wikilinked to the Swedish article. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Broadened not the right word here
 * Now "expanded". Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Unencyclopedic tone
 * Again unencyclopedic
 * Kept active?
 * Changed to "...but continued to engage in lichenology" Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Unencyclopedic
 * Unencyclopedic once again
 * Yet another case
 * I've "neutralized" the tone for all of the "unencyclopedic" examples you pointed out; I don't want to remove them entirely, as his obituaries emphasize these aspects of his personality. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Overall, the phrasing is the main problem. Other than that, the article reads well and is in good shape. Wolverine XI  ( talk to me ) 19:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing this (and all of the other lichen-related reviews you've taken on!); let me know if you think additional improvement are needed. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Nice work; promoting now. Wolverine XI   ( talk to me ) 14:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)