Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Everything is perfect in this section.)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
 * C. No original research: (No original research found.)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
 * B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (''Captions and pictures are good)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Much appreciated. Nici  Vampire  Heart  17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (''Captions and pictures are good)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Much appreciated. Nici  Vampire  Heart  17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Much appreciated. Nici  Vampire  Heart  17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)