Talk:Overdrawn at the Memory Bank/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The lead - WNET-TV redirects to WNET. I don't think the -TV is needed.
 * Done. GamerPro64  01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The Cast section - The cast and roles should be referenced, though not through unreliable websites such as IMDb.
 * Have not been told to do that, even when I made two Featured Articles on films. GamerPro64  01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair point. Dang, a GA reviewer that I dealt with must have been very strict. SL93 (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The Production and release section - WNET-TV should be WNET.
 * See above. GamerPro64  01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The Production and release section - laserdisc should be LaserDisc
 * Done. GamerPro64  01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * References - Would you be able to clip the newspaper.com references so that others can read them?
 * I would but then I realized that I have a different username for Newspapers and would not want that to be revealed. GamerPro64  01:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Would you mind if I took care of that? I have an account. SL93 (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure go ahead. GamerPro64  01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Image - I'm not sure why the source website is listed under Source and under the licensing template.
 * Removed the superfluous link. GamerPro64  01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate that you fixed the issues that were raised in the earlier peer review. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I ran Earwig and everything checks out. I see that the issues were taken care of and I added the newspaper.com clippings.

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: SL93 (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)