Talk:Overexposed (album)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Overexposed (album) → Overexposed – I may be wrong, but I can't see why people would search "overexposed" when looking for exposure to light. Maybe "Overexposure", but not "Overexposed". Unreal7 (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose a photograph is 'overexposed', so would be something someone would look for. -- 70.24.245.16 (talk) 21:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The photography term is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here as a Google 'books' and 'scholar' search reveals it has received more significant RS coverage and is of far greater educational value. Most of the hits for the music album are promotional. The term has been in standard use for many years and will continue to be applied within the field of photography when the album is long forgotten. Betty Logan (talk) 21:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose – an obscure title should not generally be primary over a generic term. Dicklyon (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose; WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as previously mentioned. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. A rather clear case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, IMO. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. At the very least, overexposed should be dab, not a redirect. --87.79.231.17 (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose. Many things can be overexposed. It should be a dab page and not a redirect, as the above said. Statυs  ( talk ) 03:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Overexposed (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517101726/http://www.maroon5.com/news_detail/maroon_5_announce_2010_north_american_tour_and_new_album_hands_all_over to http://www.maroon5.com/news_detail/maroon_5_announce_2010_north_american_tour_and_new_album_hands_all_over/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328211541/http://www.maroon5.com/news_detail/fourth_album_overexposed_june_26th to http://www.maroon5.com/news_detail/fourth_album_overexposed_june_26th/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120804234428/http://nacaodamusica.terra.com.br/br/noticias/maroon-5-overexposed-e-disco-de-ouro-no-brasil to http://nacaodamusica.terra.com.br/br/noticias/maroon-5-overexposed-e-disco-de-ouro-no-brasil/
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/603K2qQ8z?url=http://www.g-music.com.tw/GMusicBillboard2.aspx to http://www.g-music.com.tw/GMusicBillboard2.aspx
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DuDuXGkh?url=http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2012.pdf to http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2012.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120804234428/http://nacaodamusica.terra.com.br/br/noticias/maroon-5-overexposed-e-disco-de-ouro-no-brasil to http://nacaodamusica.terra.com.br/br/noticias/maroon-5-overexposed-e-disco-de-ouro-no-brasil/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://nztop40.co.nz/chart/albums

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Overexposed (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529150636/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/maroon_5s_james_valentine_adam_levine_is_an_amazing_lead_player.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/interviews/maroon_5s_james_valentine_adam_levine_is_an_amazing_lead_player.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Maroon 5 - One More Night.ogg
File:Maroon 5 - One More Night.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Page For "Lucky Strike"
I believe Lucky Strike deserves a page of its own. It was released as a single, charted, is certified gold, has been played live hundreds of times (to this very day!), and has over 100 million streams on Spotify. (I personally don't use Spotify, but I'd assume this is relevant). I have re-instated the page, and will continue to edit it to prove its notability, but I have marked it for (possible) merging. BoxxyBoy (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)