Talk:Overview of 21st-century propaganda

Inclusion of Ad counsel on the USA paragraph
As of Dec 28, 2016 this page includes a short two paragraphs about USA and links to the main page on USA propaganda. Given the brevity of the information displayed here, it seems inappropriate and perhaps even propagandesque to include the statement labelling the ad counsel as propaganda. I actually am not to familiar with his agency aside from several public service ads that it sponsore, but based on what is currently written on the main USA propaganda page, it seems really inappropriate to include that paragraph on this page.

It seems more like someone has personal beef with the ad counsel. When one goes to the full page on USA propaganda one see that it is actually only a random university professor claiming that it is like the propaganda arm of the USA govt. That is not clear here, this paragraph makes it seem like there is more consensus. I am going to delete the paragraph on the ad counsel. It is best left for the main page on USA propaganda, although I'd say even that is dubious without more support. 98.210.100.124 (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * CPV Poster Da Nang.jpg

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Communication
— Assignment last updated by Nikkig1221 (talk) 04:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)