Talk:Ovidie

Untitled
This article looks more like a fan page than an encyclopedia article: content is indeed overwhelmingly positive, unsourced and does not explain why this person is important enough to appear on Wikipedia. This violates Biographies_of_living_persons : Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space. 82.233.123.121 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a pretty POV article, overwhelmingly positive and not neutral at all, needs refinement. -CunningLinguist 07:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

"Important enough to appear on Wikipedia?" The standard is not "important enough." It is inherent scholarly interest. As sexology is an academic discipline, and the casts, production and content of adult films are a significant part of the discipline, actors as prominent as the subject of this article definitely qualify as being "significant enough" to apear on Wikipedia.Coloneldoctor (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the Colonel and think he is a genius of unparalleled stature. Whatever happened to you, anyway? The world is growing stupid without your input. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.137.178 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I also agree with the Colonel, and wonder what ever happened to him. I'm not sure Wikipedia is grand enough to earn his favor anyway. Long live the Colonel Doctor! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.156.164 (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ovidie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151120041521/http://www.metronews.fr/blog/ovidie/ to http://www.metronews.fr/blog/ovidie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

official name
refused to give her real name to the press Is that so relevant that it has to be the first sentence, given that apparently she changed her mind about it? Or would she prefer to remain pseudonymous but has been doxed? --188.101.94.74 (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)