Talk:Owl City/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Will finish in short time.  — TheSpecialUser  ( TSU ) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but this has to be a quick fail. Here is an overview of the problems;


 * Lead - it is in a bad condition and needs expansion to summarize the article.
 * Refs - they are BARE (not completely filled) as well as few of them are unreliable and few are dead
 * Due to lack of ref-standard, I doubt the content as misleading info can also be present. This is just a thought and not a reason to quick fail
 * Few claims still require reliable sources as they are completely unsourced.
 * Copyediting - The article is not upto the standards of GA and need copyediting from someone experienced

This was a premature nom and the article isn't near to a GA. I'll start my work on the article now. — TheSpecialUser  ( TSU ) 06:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)