Talk:Oxford Circus tube station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria' I have changed a section heading per the MoS. otherwise, this is a great article and I am happy to pass it as a GA. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * All reliable. No issues. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * Compared to others, has more content. All sections necessary and concise. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All own work or out of copyright. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Good captions. Alt text could be improved, but not a GA requirement though. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Convinced that an ordinary reader could get lots of detail from this article.
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All own work or out of copyright. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Good captions. Alt text could be improved, but not a GA requirement though. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Convinced that an ordinary reader could get lots of detail from this article.