Talk:Oxidation state/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 19:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment
I dispute the judgement of criteria 6. I count 20 images, mostly related to the "oxidation state algorithm" - this may fulfil 6a (although I agree that more images may be needed). 19 use the CC-BY-SA 4.0 License, while 1 is in the Public Domain, and none need captions as they are explained inline - this fulfils 6b. I hope this helps! Bibeyjj (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Sorry, I should've looked harder. I changed my review for 6b, but I'm not sure about 6a.Keresluna (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi ! Sorry for not responding to your reply sooner - not sure what happened with the ping. Thank you for following this up, and I agree with your judgements for the other criteria. Well done on conducting your first Good Article Review too!


 * I see that the original nominator has not responded to any of your queries yet, even though the account has made recent edits. This may be because pings have not reached the user due to a change in the name of their account from . I hope that the pings this message will create will alert the nominator. As you have already mentioned in your review, without improvements the article is likely a fail. Following WP:GAN/I, it is completely your decision whether to fail the article or give it more time for improvement, as it has been nearly 3 week since you completed your review. Hope this helps! Bibeyjj (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I think I will give this article one more week then if the article still isn't improved I will say its a fail. Thank you! Keresluna (talk) 23:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I will now close this nomination; it has been one week. Keresluna (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Although I don't dispute that there are quality problems or that the nominator has not followed up, I would note that "less that six days" is not a week. Due to the international nature of WP and volunteer-vs-RealWorld concerns of editors, it's important to not cut deadlines short without good cause. There are 158 references, so a simple "has original research--fail" and only one cn tag might need more nuanced explanation. DMacks (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)