Talk:Oxygen compounds

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: This article fails mainly for overuse of jargon and not meeting the criteria in lead. Remember that the lead should introduce the subject and provide a general summary of the article which is accessible to a general audience.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Article is well sourced.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: The article could use more detail on the more important compounds of oxygen. At present it reads like a list of everything which oxygen can form a compound with (which, save the noble gases, is everything!)
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images?: Good variety, all pass copyright.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. — jwandersTalk 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Compounds of aluminium which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)