Talk:Oxyhydrogen

Dead Link
The material of the dead link "O'Connor, Ken. "Hydrogen" (PDF). NASA Glenn Research Center Glenn Safety Manual' can be found at https://www.grc.nasa.gov/smad-ext/wp-content/uploads/sites/82/chapter_06.pdf, specifically on pages 11 and 29. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.28.16 (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Yull Brown
Upon a strange whim I decided to revisit the history of Brown's gas and was quite surprised to learn that Yull Borwn was not as crank as he is portrayed. At least at the beginning. Unfortunately newspaper hype created an appearance that he was a perpetuum mobile-kind of kook. When cleaned off all hype and go to sources, it appears he never claimed  that cars will run on water only. Unfortunately careless mythbusters with phrases like "the legendary Brown's gas — a modern chemical unicorn to rival phlogistion (sic! - I guess "phlogiston" ) — in which hydrogen and oxygen are combined in a non-aqueous state called 'oxyhydrogen', in the same proportions in which they are found in water (2:1). Brown's gas was allegedly used as a vehicle fuel by its discoverer, Australian inventor Yull Brown" did a great disservice to the man. Of course nothing fantastic that Brown's gas can be used as fuel.

Of course, when poor old Yull got older, he started believing in various fancy properties of his mixture used for welding and other kind of burning, but this is a different story. I think I intend to make an attempt with "Yull Brown". Poor man deserves some justice. Unfortunately vast majority of google hits go to various kook science websites, so weeding them out will probably take some time. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * P.S. To my sorrow even our famous popsci writers don't care to get their facts straight: The fiction of cold fusion (advocated, for one, by Yull Brown) (says Philip Ball) -  FAIL - other kooks said so; not Brown himself. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Brown´s gas: healthy hydrogen enriched water hiding ?
Hiding it in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water and hiding Brown´s gas here in Oxyhydrogen. Please, what is here the matter with Wikipedia ? Simply completely refuse the discussion, the health significant potential of negatively charged water, oxygen enriched water, measured with MikroSiemens (- mV; for example mothermilk between -100 and -60 mV): simply completely exclude the discussion as well as the topic itself. Brown's gas only redirected still to oxyhydrogen. But healthy thing disappearing. An example as source for ionized water, at waterfall: https://www.hohe-tauern-health.de/Content/PDFs/2012_J_Asthma.pdf Where are to find the now disappeared articles ´Brown´s gas´ and ´MicroSiemens´ (the measurement for healthy negativ loaded water), now just redirected but without being mentioned with just one word further, each ? (Sorry, perhaps MicroSiemens is not measuered with mV. Sorry, my confusion myself here, because cannot find myself what is correctly.) Sorry. --Visionhelp (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Studies Brown´s gas for human health
A link as source of studies for human health (from https://eagle-research.com/plants-dont-lie/): http://www.molecularhydrogeninstitute.com/human-studies and a good source for step-in: https://eagle-research.com/browns-gas-for-health/ (The same as german site, please, http://www.browns-gas.de/) Visionhelp (talk) 12:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Not a WP:RS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

A little reply just: I do not label Wikipedia as reliable source. --Visionhelp (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Good, neither does Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)