Talk:Ozzie, Slash, and Flea

Templates
I attempted the character templates for the three characters but I know they did not format well. So if anyone wants to re-arrange things go right ahead! Hansamurai 16:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm so sad people are editing all my funnies. :( hansamurai &#39151;&#20365; (burp) 13:16, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

Haha, I really liked them, but I guess they weren't objective..whatev. Peaceman 02:33, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I figured someone would come along eventually and erase them... just fun old fancruft anyway. :P hansamurai &#39151;&#20365; (burp) 03:08, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Frog
Frog wasn't in Zenan Bridge at the time. He was in Cursed Woods, so only Chrono, and two other party members were there, no frog. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zero R (talk • contribs).


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

move. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 10:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

 * Ozzie, Slash and Flea → Ozzie, Slash, and Flea … Rationale: The second comma (a serial comma) is gramatically correct in my opinion. On December 27, 2005, Apostrophe moved it from my proposed name to the new one, giving no rationale; it was originally at the name with the two commas and it should be moved back. I would do it, but since both pages exist, I cannot. Even if there is not a specific Wikipedia concensus on the issue and this does not avoid ambiguity, it should not have been moved in the first place.I don't think that this really needs a discussion, so I'm not putting one up (you can put one if you disagree); I'm putting this here just as part of the notice. -Platypus Man | Talk 22:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer the serial-comma-less version, too. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 10:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * move, I like commas too. --Snarius 05:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * move. This is, to a large degree, a British-American issue (Oxford and many other British academic publishing houses being on the American side here, as with the -ize issue). Such unmotivated changes shouldn't be made. The comma should return! BrianinStockholm 06:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC) P.S. Any experts out there know why four tildes stopped producing a link to my user page a while back? Please answer on my talk page. Thanks!


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Name speculation
Regarding this change, if it is not speculation, it needs a source. If it is speculation, it does not fit Wikipedia. No original thought, no original research. -- ReyBrujo 20:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, it is fact; it is obvious that this is what it is. However, I have no proof of this. Just because it does not have a source does not mean that it is any less true. I reworded it in that change to make it appear like it would not need a citation. Remove the information if you absolutely must, but there has to be a way to keep it. Can't anyone find a valid source? -Platypus Man | Talk 20:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That is why I think keeping the previous version is better. Even though it has a citation tag, people will be encouraged to search for a source. The way it is now, nobody will care whether the assumption is real or not. -- ReyBrujo 21:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. I added it back. -Platypus Man | Talk 01:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)