Talk:PEDF

Untitled
Several suggestions. First I do not dispute that PEDF may have value in various clinical situations but the primary writers of this page may wish not to over promise. I suggest that the second sentance be deleted, it is a promise. The potential utility is discussed later in the article so little will be lost. Second, please avoid the phrase "its a fact that". Just describe the information and reference the point with primary experimental source. The idea of these articles are to inform not to convince. Thanks for considering these suggestions.

Charles L. Brooks The Ohio State University — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.107.153.223 (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

...Is that better? --JohnLattier (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)