Talk:PEOPLEnet

Untitled
These article appears to be of non encyclopedic value and designed more as a part of a commercial campaign to noble a competitive advantage of the focus of the article. bias. It is proposed that this article be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.243.156.214 (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I disagree; the article is one in a series by the same author about GSM telecom service providers in Ukraine including Kyivstar, MTS, Beeline, Golden Telecom, Astelit, see it's author's contribution list []. The article itself appears to me to be neutral and factual; some of those facts may put the company in a better light than some of its competitors, but such is the nature of the real world. Taken in the context of similar articles about its competitors the article does not seem to give any deliberate advantage to any particular company. Encyclopaedic value lies in its contribution to readers' understanding of the development of GSM services in Ukraine - why should this not be a valid subject? Timberframe (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PEOPLEnet logo.gif
Image:PEOPLEnet logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)