Talk:PHB (bicycle)

[untitled]
For searching one uses the Category: Hydrogen bicycle. In the text one should be accurate in describing the product and how it works. Using the term 'hydrogen' in combination with 'bicycle' may be clear to insiders, not to outsiders. The bicycle does not directly run on hydrogen. It is the necessary electricity that comes from hydrogen. VanBurenen (talk) 14:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That depends on the approach, cat searching is only one of many options, if we would do it your way it would be hydrogen electrical bicycle, which is to long, common approach is hydrogen bicycle, otherwise you wouldn't have a difference with a electrical battery bike, so i will set is back to its former state. Cheers Mion (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Update
So, two years passed and it is not clear whether the bicycle remained merely a project or prototype or if it actually produced and sold. The information needs to be updated. The article in its current state is more fit for Wikinews, not Wikipedia. --Abanima (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Yesterday the now if not then company who promoted the original development and has removed the page announced a six hundred dollar home charger for cars while still a penny stock
(penny stock companies are those below $5)

I am in agreement this is out of date but it should not be redacted- "minit" etc. do enough of that. The bike was apparently highly oversized in it's expensive component, the range extender essentially in the fuel cell. Hybrid bikes use us currently as the range extender essentially- taking over for the battery more then it takes over for us in the best designs that have the battery unlike us recover energy we put into inertia by diverting it from rubbing away the brake pads and then restore it for take off's to momentum in accelerating the earth or to be more contemporary perhaps us against the rest of the planet etc.

I found this text on facebook actually and I do not think they should be at risk of making things even more out of date by hosting there own copy of cotent taken from here? That is they suppress it's modernisation clearly

anyway as is often the case the contributor in essence of this project's news has not gotten a patent since then in fact for over a decade. It is unclear if it's only recently failed in going public.

I assume that...

my point is that this bike was in field generating of it's electricity from chemical or electrochemical sure process- it was using in essence a gas (phase of fuel as opposed to liquid or medium pressure propane etc.) flow battery aka 'fc' as described quaintly. Currently the source argues that charging smaller batteries more frequently from the grid though is the way to go- despite that meaning source energy is from burning or using about twice as much fuel at best. The idea was if divorced from the tuxedo'd venture crowd of antiquity beying how many hours or days if not months ago that was that vehicles can be very personal but some component of them beyond the road can be shared. So when parking your charger is free to be picked up by someone going moble to charge while not accelerating the energy storing for accelerating modes device on board beyond it. You get out and go in or on the location but the mesh instead of centralised, distributed and therefore both cost shared and quality enabled- solid gold not tin plated class of equipment is scalable.

Since them much has changed even in my understanding- "bounce" is word- not "blink" when it comes to topping off- pulling into the parking space is the ball hitting and then when it joins someone else it's speed return in the opposite direction.

(I can't use the here without the robots to the human references clearly enough made above catching them silly! this is the talk page!)

It's my hope that one of the regular editors can take these concepts and restructure this- because bikes can for example be shared alternatively between people wanting a workout/going down hill to charge them and those needing only speed or more power then once a day charging would allow to get up the hill.

IN essence then the sun is like gravity in creating the methane which is like the motion/speed and what we have is a big whole in the market- just like tha tanswerd by the buying clubs when the super balls of yesteryear stopped being sold and had to be made from the bulk resin social networks of enthusiasts created using paper envelopes and postage and long distance phone calls to suppliers with a littel roberts rules of order thrown in to club meetings.

"PHB"is horrific wshatever it's provinance.

It's about carrying something to kick each time you start instead of the equivalent of gun powder because we are not bullets. We just need a little expediting to keep the roads from congesting lol.

I understand why this page is so hidden and poorly written and have tried to hint at least about the banal truth that cars are only profitable- not really useful, and it is our role to give people access to that information finally.

So this should be moved to a propiganda section- the lengths that the auto industry and it's puppet suppliers goto to  slur competing/evolving modes.

Or perhaps we are just another content provider for the "42” LCD display for optional media and advertising" pew coming to our third (versus just home andwork) place? (credit to taco bell)

We just gave $50k scholarship to someone going to Harvard despite it- for being motivated to untie cell phone essentially users from the grid even further- who talks about half minute charging of them instead of subsecond duh- when the question for transit is how long to get from loading to fifteen (garbage trucks are faster at 4 mph on average then long beaches initial batch of once  a day  charging six figure more expensive for being domestic labor and insane engineering beyond that seven figure -i kid youi not- per steering wheel gouge) or double walking speed, imagine that for just a million bucks we can get there in half th etime of walking in any size group versus dozen or so?- ours must be, how many million watts can that puppy receive so as to not have to even slow down to top off as it passes it's access to the grid? Because for transit the fuel cells MUST not be moble- not just the farebox not or not merely smaller lol.

This article then is about a nonexistent product that till now has prevented it's real concept from disrupting essentially domestic terrorism like that of the hummer schemes now seen in Fiat's screams.

It's the waffle meets the petroleum molecules- iron turned into not rolling in the aisles by bouncing down the sidewalks wearing antigravity shoes finally that with hops and skips make contempory mobility nearly free again despite being twice or better as fast even when just terrestial.

It wasn't ever "real soon now"- it wasn't ever to be brought to market- it was  just a stunt, before they scaled it up to insanity and put them on bus's!

Where does one write the check to get the above requested edit's staffed?

I estimate it's about half a days work formatting and all to get it done right and know plenty of funds are trivial to obtain to shed such light. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.126.36 (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)