Talk:PHUNK

Phunk Studio article for Neutral point of view
Dear members, I recognise Phunk as a home-grown talent and deserving documentation on Wikipedia. Having said that i note of the article's slant towards advertising, and therefore advised the page's developers to continue to work towards the guidelines stipulated by Neutral point of view. It also improves the writing credibility to meet GA criteria, and to be recommended as a Good Article. Let's work towards that -- Marcuslim (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The Creative Review reference (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=48022303065&ref=mf) and Asia Tatler reference (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=48026483065&ref=mf) links to Phunk Studio's Facebook fan page where the articles are reposted; not an unbiased source. Could not locate original sources for the articles. Removing the references until they can be re-sourced. Removed the extensive list of publications, lectures, etc. as they read more like a resume. Removed quotes about LASALLE College of the Arts as they do not directly apply to the subject. Mortal (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Brain Magazine .png
 * Phiz dingbats.jpg
 * Singapore Airlines Rolls Royce PHUNK.jpg
 * Time Out Hong Kong cover artwork.png