Talk:PLACE Built Environment Centre

Clarity Issues
This article might be too technical and may require some addition defining of terms. For example the term "architecture centre" is not widely used in English by the average populace. Especially in the opening summary of the article the references to specific organizations in the country affiliated with the PLACE should be avoided. A straight forward and simpler explanation of what it is, why it is, where it is and what it does should be in the intro. The more specific details can be addressed under the appropriate headings later in the article. Legion211 (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the feedback - will have a look in the next few days to improve. --Tugboat2011 (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure. I look forward to seeing the article develop. Legion211 (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Have made a few changes in line with your suggestions. Hopefully it's on the right track now, but if not let me know. --Tugboat2011 (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Article is much easier to read, nice change. I added dates and authors to your references, don't forget to cite those. Most of your references are from the PLACE site or are affiliated with the PLACE site. While it is generally acceptable to have some references affiliated with the article topic, most of the references should not be affiliated with the topic in order to help present an unbiased view. Legion211 (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)