Talk:PLAID syndrome

note
Editor NalphMath seems a little over enthusiastic. This is a rare condition with only 4-5 papers in the literature.

I think if NalphMath reads the paper he/she cited he/she might consider placing this template to be a mistake. Virion123 (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Material is taken from US government site, which according to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home/about/policies/#copyright has put it in the public domain). Even if there may be other problems, this is not a case of CSD --Travelbird (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The previous comment is interesting as I was completely unaware of the existence of the page linked to until now. Virion123 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The question really is: did you take the text from anywhere off the internet? If you did then be aware that that is generally not a good idea. There are exceptions when you may take text because it is in the public domain, but doing so almost always leads to discussions such as these. If you do take text that your beleive to be public domain material, it is good to state that on the talk page. Travelbird (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * While it might be difficult for some editors to believe I actually wrote this material myself. I read the articles and produced a summary of them. Simple because the words are unusual it seems that the editor that queried this seems to think that this was copied from the net.Virion123 (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is the report from the automatic copyright detector: "Couldn't find any text in http://may_be_partial_copyright_vio_of_https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/plcg2-associated-antibody-deficiency-and-immune-dysregulation-plaid." Since this seems to resolve the issue here it is time to put this matter to bed. Virion123 (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi! I came here from WP:Copyright problems. Thanks for being aware of copyright issues,, but in this case the overlap appears to consists only of a few technical phrases. I think we can safely accept 's statement here and knock this one off the list. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)