Talk:PLL multibit

Environment conducive to quality articles

 * Notices against the article were placed in the article, yet - there is no discussion in the Discussion section, as it should be.

(written by the author of this article) --Zutam (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there . Please note I am 100% unaware of what pll multibit is, and I just happened to browse by . Some suggestions: )You are describing an algorithm - I think - so that should be one of the first 10 words in introduction . )You are basically out of context when you write on wikipedia, most certainly for highly specialized articles . You use interwiki a lot, which is ideal, but the context should be verbalized . For instance section-title 'Concepts' is demanding the reader switching to a technical and material thought-process . However, what is the material circumstance on which these concepts apply ? Another perspective of that section would be verbalizing the conceptual framework and a much better word is here 'terminology' . Create a history . )Finally it is critical to get the references right . I do not think you can expect people to purposely proof-read other articles, although it does happen . Summer greetings from Sechinsic (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Good suggestion, thanks. Actually the PLL is not an algorithm but an electronic component or module or system; anyway I hope the change I made addresses your question - the Multibit PLL is just another type of phase locked loop, you can see there further details.

--Zutam (talk) 22:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am also a bit supprised on multi-bit PLLs! In literature, conferences, patents, etc. there is much more discussion about fractional-N (or sigma-delta) PLLs than on multi-bit, but the separation is not clear, e.g. some author talk about multi-bit fractional-N PLLs! There is some overlap, but there could be also significant difference. It could be that multi-bit is meant more general, but on the other hand there is little usage of the word multi-bit PLL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.131.238.28 (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Author protests changes incompatible with WP policy
Edit wars on style are unacceptable. It also is bad Wikiette. Unless someone objects (with specific arguments), I intend to return the empty spaces.
 * Empty lines were removed from the article, without any discussion. I disaprove.

--Zutam (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * A complete section was removed. I disagree. There was no discussion, they didn't contact me.


 * No, this is editing. Please notice the advisory that shows up ever single time you use the on-line editor:
 * "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. All text that you did not write yourself, except brief excerpts, must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you submit it."
 * The deleted section has nothing to say about the subject of the article, except for one line that has been moved up under benefits.  --Wtshymanski (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The images are copyrighted; we cannot use copyrighted images on Wikipedia. --Wtshymanski (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I have removed some blank lines from the article. We don't usually use empty lines for layout on Wikipedia. The system provides sufficient whitespace on its own, in most cases.--Srleffler (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Questions:

1. Can you cite resources in support of your claim "we cannot use copyrighted images on Wikipedia"?

2. Line 8 your edit: why do you insert irrelevant and incorrect statements about "all-digital-PLL"?

3. You add an irrelevant discussion about all-digital-PLL, but delete my definition of this subject, which is relevant as background for this article - why?

4. Line 8 your edit: why did you delete my definitions? they are useful to a reader and relevant to the article. 5. Line 17, relevant material was deleted - why?

--Zutam (talk) 07:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Examine the file upload page - it explains Wikipedia policy for image use. By saying "all rights reserved" you have exposed Wikpedia to the possibility of copyright infringement.
 * As for the rest, I found the article to be badly organized and a little lazy in explaining the concepts. Listing 40 patents is not writing an encyclopedia article. You have the same user name as one of the book authors cited, so surely you're familiar with the need for organization of material in a logical order, and with the need for editing. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Use of copyrighted pictures
Following is an example of WP use of copyrighted pictures.

" File:Template-info.svg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search File File history File links Global file usage

Template-info.svg‎ (SVG file, nominally 117 × 60 pixels, file size: 24 KB)

This image rendered as PNG in other sizes: 200px, 500px, 1000px, 2000px.

This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below. Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. You can help. This high-risk image, which is widely used on Wikimedia projects, has been protected to prevent vandalism. [Italics added by zutam].

Please discuss changes on the talk page or request unprotection.

Summary Description Template-info.svg English: Template information icon Date 9 March 2007(2007-03-09) Source Own work, based on Image:Gtk-dialog-info.svg Author User:Quarl, David Vignoni (Image:Gtk-dialog-info.svg) Permission (Reusing this file) See below. Other versions Derivative works of this file:

Template-info-subst.png

Licensing I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation "  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zutam (talk • contribs) 11:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Linking an orphan article
Related articles can be found using for example the following keywords:
 * PLL
 * phase locked loop
 * telecommunications
 * frequency synthesizer
 * phase noise
 * CDMA
 * frequency hopping
 * CPU

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.28.233 (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)