Talk:PM WIN-T

Marketing Fluff
I cleaned up some, but there's still a lot of marketing words in this article. The article should be a factual description of what the system/development is for; it should be encyclopedic, and there's still an awful lot of hyperbole. --Sam (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I used the word funding re-allocation where (5) is sourced. The article is about a debate of whether funding is neccessary during a specific fical year, not over the life of the program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PEOC3TPublicAffairs (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)