Talk:PR Newswire

Proposed merge of ProfNet into PR Newswire
Not notable on its own merits Rogermx (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I note the intervening deletion discussion. I support the merge, on the grounds that discussing them together seems more efficient for readers. Might XOR'easter have a view, having improved ProfNet since the article was proposed for merging? Klbrain (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I tentatively oppose the merge, since ProfNet turned out to have a substantial history prior to the acquisition, and there's no need to discuss it only as part of its current ownership. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Support merge - per nomination, even if XOR'easter is stating that ProfNet has its own history the article has not reflected but of it to be an independent article as such it can be reflected at the PR Newswire. Then in the if the PR Newswire article becomes long that is when you can propose a split. - DownTownRich (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)