Talk:PSR B1828−11

Quark Planet?
A quark planet? Really? I'm afraid I'm skeptical on that count.

In order for quark degeneracy (which is still a theoretical concept) to occur, you require an extremely high density. I don't believe any planetary mass object would be capable of attaining and maintaining such a density. It's still quite likely that this planets composition may be very different to those known to us, but this would be due to it being born in a supernova.

Any thoughts? --InvaderXan (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 02 July 2014

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 07:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

PSR B1828-10 → PSR B1828-11 – The list of articles in SIMBAD shows that the designation PSR B1828-11 is more frequently-used than the PSR B1828-10 designation. 77.57.25.250 (talk) 22:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Support per WP:COMMONNAME, which tells us to use the name that is most recognizable. In this case, that would be the -11 name. StringTheory11 (t • c) 22:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orbitbox
Why have the above orbitboxes above been removed? 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 19:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The first because the planets were disproven, as the article states; the second I don't know. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)