Talk:PVSRIPO

Not about PVS-RIPO
The conclusion of the 2014 review article seems far too general for this article. Suggest delete the whole sentence and the quote : A 2014 review article in the peer-reviewed journal Cancer by some of the main researchers on PVSRIPO concluded that : "The recent promise of oncolytic virotherapy in the clinic, [that is], our observations with PVSRIPO, demonstrate that relentless preclinical, mechanistic research addressing all aspects of the virus:host relationship can yield promising clinical results in the most difficult oncologic indications that resist all available conventional therapy.[1]:3284" - Rod57 (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No objections so I've deleted it (and replaced it with details of PVS-RIPO) Still too much about Duke U in article. - Rod57 (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)