Talk:Pacific RailNews

Against deletion!
As a fellow Wikipedian and railroad enthusiast, I'd like to offer my thoughts on the importance of this article. First, it documents the existence of a print source of information. Something that Wikipedia itself relies on greatly. Given the length of time the periodical was published and the IMHO significant number of issues that were produced, the argument can be made that it is part of the integral support structure of Wikipedia itself. Second, notability is relative especially within certain communities or interest groups. Something that is insignificant to one person with one particular set of interests or passions can be critically important to another. Third, the articles inclusion does no harm to WP. Is the article as useful or well developed as others, probably not, but its far from "useless". --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This article's proposed deletion was canceled by another editor two days later, and that action was not challenged, so the article is no longer proposed for deletion. SJ Morg (talk) 08:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)