Talk:Pacifica Foundation/Archive 1

Mexico?
Why has this been designated a "Mexico broadcasting stubs" and categorized among "Mexico radio networks"? I don't see any indication that they have stations in Mexico. -Willmcw 20:26, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

don't forget KFCF in Fresno
88.1 fm in Fresno is the central valley's home to pacifica.


 * There are only 5 stations chartered as Pacifica stations. Many other community, college, and public broadcasting stations also carry some Pacifica programming, but this does not make them a Pacifica station. Bhuston 04:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

How can we expand this page?
Any ideas?--Jersey Devil 03:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Missing History?
I'm rather surprised to not find the history of the KPFK lockout, the KPFT bombings, the hostile takeover of the Pacifica Board, and the listener lawsuit. Bhuston 04:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KPFKlogo.jpg
Image:KPFKlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

A little help needed
I just finished reformatting the "National Board" table. However, try as I might (tried everything I could think of), I was unable to come up with the "magic code" to close off that section and keep the next section ("See also") from intruding/overlapping. Can anyone point out the solution? (I'm sure there must be one.) Cgingold 12:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It looks like a mess. Might as well just revert it back to how it was before.--Jersey Devil 12:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I just moved the table back to the history section. The way it was made the article look really bad....sorry. By all means if you can find a better way to put it feel free to change it.--Jersey Devil 09:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Nice, Emerson fixed it. It looks good now.--Jersey Devil 19:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Early History
I'd like to see this entry fleshed out with more extensive history prior to the 1990s (putting it in its historical perspective from the 1940s, etc.) MariaMitchell (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:KPFT Logo.gif
The image Image:KPFT Logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * Image:WBAI Logo.gif

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --23:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Whitewash
This article reads like a PR release by a supporter. It should discuss the historic role of Pacifica as a communist front organization, and it's widely criticised and controversial funding by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Pacifica is simply not a politically active liberal public radio outlet. KPFK/Pacifica admits all day long every day that it is a radical, revolutionary, Marxist activist organizational hub. It partners with International ANSWER and Code Pink at rallies; praises Seattle anarchists, the "LA Rebellion", and car burning eco-terrorists; campaigns for Green, Socialist, and Peace & Freedom candidates; lauds Castro and Chavez; is pro-Palestinian to the point of anti-Semitism; officially promotes 9-11 conspiracy theorists; for four years referred to Bush as "President-Select Bush" in it's "news" stories; and broadcasts revolutionary rhetoric from cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal. It represents the radical extreme of leftist activism. And it receives million annually from the CPB, and payes no taxes. One preacher campaigns for a candidate and the IRS investigates the church's tax free status, but Pacifica remains tax-free and publicly-funded despite strident and partisan political organizing and advocacy. None of this controversy gets one word of attention here. By sin of omission, this article makes Pacifica sound like Air America. It's degrees of magnitude more controversial and revolution-oriented than that, and there is a world of criticism which needs to be cited. 204.13.195.226 19:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP. Furthermore for future purposes please do not vandalize my user page as you did here. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 01:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, much of what the ranting anon said is true; however, it cannot be on Wikipedia without reliable sources. If you can find reliable criticism, it should be included.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Scientology
The reference to Scientology in the now-deleted section would require both a reliable source and evidence of notability. As a minor target of a sporge attack, probably by the CoS, in the 1990s, I have no interest in supporting them or of giving them credibility, but that material was unsourced material about a living person, and should have been summarily removed, as it was. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

A "Network"?
I question the liberal use of the word "network" on this page. Pacifica clearly does not fit Wiki's own definition of a "system which distributes programming to multiple stations simultaneously, or slightly delayed". Pacifica makes a menu of programs available which AFAIK are taken on an à la carte basis to be broadcast at a time of each station's choosing, rather than as a live feed (excepting of course live news feeds on special events). The previous wording on the page describing a "network of over 100 stations" clearly was misleading for that reason, especially considering the organization owns only five stations and even they don't simulcast most programming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.241.148 (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pacifica Radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130208085249/http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=1299528035837796976&hl=en to http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1299528035837796976&hl=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Pacifica Foundation Radio Board of Directors
This is an already-set up section but contains names that are no longer PNB Pacifica Nat'l Board members and needs to be revised. I hesitate to incur wrath of those who want to continue to think they are important there. The elections of PNB just took place a few months ago with some contentions of who is legit and who is no longer eligible, being termed-out. Resolution and stability is not yet in sight. Just sayin' Activistrep (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)activistrep

Ongoing conflicts: 2016
added update to very old prior "ongoing topics 2002" with 4+ citations for external information and reference to a recent summary of recent actions by attys & individuals to 'take over' bankrupt radio stations, umbrellaled by Pacifica. not sure if I'm doing "citations" correctly, so please just correct the process I may not be doing well enough. info is relevant and there is so much contradictory versions in various small media sites of all sides that is 'too much' to include anywhere. No prejudices or alliances are exploited here. Activistrep (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)activistrep


 * Frankly, much of the material you added should not be on Wikipedia in its current form. It reads as if written by someone with an axe to grind. It says in Wikipedia's voice many disparaging things about the organization and many of the individuals involved. As such this material absolutely demands excellent references, per WP:V and WP:RS, references that show reliable sources expressing these judgments (WP editors are not allowed to make judgments, that is called original research or original synthesis). And this will be needed for every claim of fact.


 * Note that it is ok to say e.g. "So-and-so concluded that the organization was in financial trouble", if so-and-so can be considered an authority, and if it is backed up by a reference to a direct quote in a WP:RS. It is not at all ok for Wikipedia to appear to draw such a conclusion on its own.


 * Furthermore, and more urgently, everything on WP that mentions a living person—particularly if it puts them in a negative light—absolutely must comply with the more stringent referencing requirements of WP:BLP.


 * And then there's WP:NPOV.


 * Have you had some past connection with Pacifica? If so you must also comply with WP:COI.


 * In sum, I am not quite ready to revert back to the version before any of your edits, but I'm certainly leaning that way. At the very minimum I am likely to lace the whole thing with "citation needed", "according to whom?", etc,. templates. The result of your edits reads like something that belongs as an article in a magazine where people expect to find strong opinions, like maybe Rolling Stone or Esquire. Not an encyclopedia article. This is not the place to "get the truth out about what is happening at Pacifica", and that's the impression you've given me. If that is in fact your purpose you need to find another outlet. Jeh (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

This article needs to be updated with info on controversy over WBAI's back-owed rent situation and how that might force all Pacifica Foundation station off the air.
Apparently the owner of WBAI's lease has been accused of price gouging over broadcast antenna lease costs and has attempted to cease all assets of the Pacifica Foundation to reclaim back owed rent regarding the lease. Here are some articles covering the details:


 * Radio Broadcaster Pacifica Teeters on Edge of Bankruptcy - https://www.wsj.com/articles/radio-broadcaster-pacifica-teeters-on-edge-of-bankruptcy-1514907785


 * KPFA could be forced off air, with Pacifica in stalemate over damaging lawsuit - http://www.berkeleyside.com/2018/01/03/kpfa-forced-off-air-pacifica-stalemate-damaging-lawsuit/


 * Breaking: Berkeley's KPFA Radio Facing Ruin as New York Real Estate Corporation Considers Seizing Station's Assets to Settle Lawsuit - https://www.eastbayexpress.com/SevenDays/archives/2017/12/28/berkeleys-kpfa-radio-facing-ruin-as-new-york-real-estate-corporation-considers-seizing-stations-assets-to-settle-lawsuit

---2600:1700:56A0:4680:AC67:F809:37FC:6D85 (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:56A0:4680:AC67:F809:37FC:6D85 (talk)


 * Seemingly as of April 2018, Pacifica took out a loan to satisfy their debtor, Empire State. KPFA alone, is worth over $125 million. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:3D91:3408:6ECD:BF7A (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)