Talk:Packy mural/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Happy to review this. MWright96 (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Description and history

 * Historic Preservation League of Oregon is a dab link
 * I added the org's current name. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * " which was considered a "painted wall decoration", " - considered by whom? The Portland Bureau of Planning?
 * I changed the wording a bit. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * "In addition, The mural" - the first letter of the third word in this sentence shouldn't be captalized
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Reception

 * The Wikilink to The Oregonian in this section should be removed and added to the one in the Description and history sub-section
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)