Talk:Padgett's Creek Baptist Church

Use of Facebook page as a source on this page
Copied from my talkpage:

Padgett's Creek Baptist Church

Thanks for your message: Per Wiki docs, we are allowed to add a home website to a page represents our business (church) that we did not create if it helps to clarify and better represent the information. Our website happens to be a facebook site so i know that means we have conflicting doctrines within the same discussion. This is important to the church, not because of the Wiki Article but because it has also been sucked into facebook and created a page there related to the national historic places. that in itself is great but it is confusing people who are trying to find us on facebook because it ends up being first in the list. Adding this link will get the people to visit the true website and proved more clear information for them. Since i cannot get the wiki created page out of facebook or claim ownership to it this is the last resort to providing accurate information to the people who will review this. (user talk:pagcrkbapchurch) — Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The problem is, if I add it back, then someone is just going to remove it again. I'm going to move this talk to Talk:Padgett's Creek Baptist Church, so other users can comment. Personally, I'm in favour of using Facebook in this case, but if I add it back, someone will revert it. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

In my opinion, since this does appear to be the best source of information, it should be used, even though it is usably a bad idea to use Facebook. What do other users think? Joseph2302 (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for putting this out here Joseph. We are a small church, if we had the resources we would have a non-facebook website. I'm not sure how we would prevent its removal but I do appreciate the discussion in this forum to figure it out (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 21:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)