Talk:Paid protester

dyk suggestion
DTM (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ... that paid protestors around the world have been referred to as 'boxed lunch crowd', 'protest lifeforms' and 'special-assignment female units'?

mention of US politics in intro
I think this is a worthy and even interesting topic for a wikipedia article. However, I have my doubts as to whether Qanon and Donald Trump should be mentioned in the introductory section. After all, this is a topic that is relevant to many countries across a number of eras, it's not specific to US politics. (in fact--it's probably more common in some other countries). Just a thought.--Dan Carkner (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I added that paragraph because, for the vast majority of our audience (unfortunately still North America and Europe) paid protestor claims are misinformation not -- if there is a more elegant way to deal with it that would be great. Sadads (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your thoughtful response. I agree it's a difficult issue and one that should be addressed to the audience that may read it. Just to me it will become less and less relevant in the intro section over time as Trump and Q recede from recent memory. And keeping in mind that English wiki still does have a global audience too. But I will leave it to your judgement and that of other editors.--Dan Carkner (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Move to Paid protester
As 'protestor' is a common misspelling of the word 'protester', shouldn't we be moving this article to a correctly-spelled location? - Swiss Mister in NY (talk) 13:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Both spellings are used in the sources, which indicates "protestor" is more of an alternative spelling than a misspelling (which is also how dictionaries seem to treat it). But I'd say this is probably a case where you could safely boldly move it yourself without any strong objections. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅. Schierbecker (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

2023 World Snooker Championship
I appreciate you rewording this sentence to address my concerns, but I think there's a broader problem of relevance to this article that's still unaddressed. In other words, now we know that this wasn't a paid protest, the only claim we can make is that a non-notable person once sought payment for protesting, with an unknown degree of success. We don't have anything relating to an actual paid protest or protester, let alone any indication of encyclopaedic significance. (The source also seems very muddled on what it's trying to say: the headline and lede say this has to do with paid protesting, but the body makes it very clear it's a case of somebody crowdfunding for expenses that are only loosely protest-related.) As such, I'm still of the view that this is a minor tabloid story that's only distantly related to this subject and do doesn't merit a mention in this article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)