Talk:Paige Niemann

Notability Tag
I have removed the notability tag since the AfD closed and the question of notability was no consensus. If an editor still believes that this is not a notable person they should send it to AfD again. Bruxton (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no connection to the article . But the article was is in a holding pattern at DYK for the duration of the AfD, and with the notability tag hung there, the article is arrested again. I have no opinion about the notability but my concern is that a single editor who has nominated the article for deletion has now tagged the article after the community was divided on notability. Bruxton (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Bruxton, thanks for the ping. My goal is to obtain consensus.  Hopefully the article will be improved over the next week or so, so as to meet WP:GNG, and overcome, in what my opinion, is a BIO1E issue.  I'm not hopeful, since no effort was put into improving the article while it was at AfD, but one can always hope.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've also removed the tag – a notability tag is only helpful if an AfD hasn't already taken place. If the AfD resolves as "no consensus", that defaults to keep. Unless there's a doubt on notability that might merit relitigating the AfD (a higher bar), there's no reason to reapply the tag. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 21:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * While a "no-consensus" result defaults to the article being kept, it does not decide whether or not the subject is actually notable. Since, there does not appear any willingness to improve the article, I've sent it back to AfD. Onel 5969  TT me 22:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)