Talk:Pairwise coprime

Merger
Should this article be merged into Coprime? Richard Pinch (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Then articles which mentioned pairwise coprimality would have to link to a section of the coprime article. On the other hand I guess the only reason I followed the link was because I wondered what other types of coprime there were than pairwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.217.169 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I vote yes: this article will never naturally have enough information to merit being its own article, while it would work very naturally as a section or two of the article coprime. I've stuck on a template. Joel B. Lewis (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, and there' consensus at the other talk page, as well. I'm going ahead with the merge. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)