Talk:Pak'ma'ra

Hump
What IS the hump on their backs?? --Kizor 07:40, 2 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The males of their species, which are a parasite.

Merging
Oppose. This article should just be linked with a Main Article link like several of the other B5 races are on the same article.--Primalchaos 23:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Most if not all, the notable (or encylopedic) information for such a minor species in the Babylon 5 universe is already included on the main page. Radagast83 21:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree, and believe a short article is perfectly appropriate for the fictional race. If you disagree about their importance, that's an issue for fandom but not information.--Primalchaos 02:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Lowercase pak'ma'ra
Yes, race names are usually capitalized, but in this case, the creator of the race writes this race's name, and only this race's name, in lowercase. See, for example: This makes it pretty clear to me that this specific race is an exception to the rule. --Psiphiorg 16:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "...the Hyach, the pak'ma'ra, a bit more on Minbari culture..."
 * "...such as the Gaim and the pak'ma'ra..."
 * "...if it were the Drazi rather than the Markabs? ... cut out the pak'ma'ra as primary..."
 * "The pak'ma'ra are indeed tech scavengers..."
 * "...there's the Drazi..., the pak'ma'ra..., the Abbai, ..."


 * A google search reveals most top entries spell the word correctly. This includes www.stephenaustin.com page of the actor playing the Pak'ma'ra ambassador on the show. Actually, he capitalizes the first letter of each of the three syllables, as a response possibly to the small p. Proper English requires a capital for proper nouns, even for fictional names. And, if you ask Joe Straczynski, he may tell you that the reason for the small p is to indicate the racial prejudice of others against the Pak'ma'ra. Wikipedia not being a place to show support for racial prejudice, will rightly capitalize in accordance with proper English. Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.48.211 (talk) 05:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The fact that it is not capitalized suggests it is not intended to be a proper noun. To say that it needs capitalization because it's a proper noun would be circular reasoning. There's no reason an alien species' name must be a proper noun. Species names are generally NOT proper nouns: human, ape, bee, shrimp, oak, mint, mushroom, etc. And I'm sure these names are not targets of racial prejudice. -- Yel D&#39;ohan (talk) 09:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pak'ma'ra n drazi.JPG
Image:Pak'ma'ra n drazi.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Please...
Humanoid in form, the Pak'ma'ra have tentacles around a mouth cavity containing an inflexible beak, somewhat reminiscent of the mind flayers of Dungeons & Dragons, or the fictional entity Cthulhu[original research?].

"[original research?]"?! For the love of God, look at them...

Basesurge (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)