Talk:Paleo Crossing site

"secondary sources"
The original dates in the article (apparently doubtful at that) were off by 2K years because. Use the actual radiocarbon dates. Never trust secondary source in this field. Ploversegg (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It looks like you handled this correctly, : Explaining the more recent knowledge.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)