Talk:Paleogeography of the India–Asia collision system

University of Hong Kong
--LkwkarenHKU (talk) 16:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * There are some typos (e.g. intracoceanic --> Intraoceanic??)
 * More bluelinks could be inserted for geology terms (e.g. calc-alkaline, Cretaceous, Jurassic etc)
 * The passage under paleo drainage pattern is pretty long, and without bluelinks. But the illustrations are good enough to explain the text.

Hi Ariel, The article is very organized. Here are some suggestions. Makhkugeo (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It would be great if you could explain more how the tectonic process can understand more about the "interaction between the Himalayas orogenic growth and the Asian monsoon system, as well as the dispersal and speciation of faunas".
 * It would be great to add several evidence to show that the Tibet plateau is located in the equatorial region, rather than high latitude region.
 * It would be great if you could explain how plateau (i.e a large flat highland) can develop via the Mesozoic uplift model

Hello Ariel,

I like your definitions of the title and the collision onset. They are clear and specific. There are some suggestions:


 * Typos for "hypothese" and "involeves" in the first sentence in the Diachronous collision hypotheses section(?)
 * Some references need to be added in the captions of the illustrations.
 * Some links can be added for the geological time periods.

--HelenHYW (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

The content is precise and easy to understand, here are some suggestions for you: --JacqCLSin (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Most figures cannot be seen (it says the files were deleted or moved?)
 * Organisation of content isn’t very clear, maybe "Diachronous collision hypotheses" and "Synchronous collision hypothesis" can be put in new sections instead of cramming them under "Timing of collision onset"?
 * some spelling mistakes here and there
 * “see also” — can separate wikipedia links and external links

Good Topic and easy to understand with good English. Some suggestions are as below: 1. Figures can't be loaded. 2. Some citations are placed before ".", some after, be consistent. 3. Content page looks messy, maybe you should change the type of title you are using. Kenwongtk (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey Ariel,

Your introduction is clear, which summarises what your page is about :)

Here are some suggestions: Yansytang (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The photos cannot be seen! It would be much easier to understand the hypotheses if the photos were shown.
 * There are a few typos throughout the page. One found in the intro: defferent
 * Missing citation for "Detrital zircons from these basins shares same age peaks at 100 Ma." in the section of Detrital zircon age patterns (NW-SE). Citations are also needed for figures if necessary.