Talk:Palmarolle

Untitled
- the page was moved.

Page move
There's really nothing that needs to be discussed. There's no other Palmarolle page. RandySavageFTW (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That fact doesn't, in and of itself, prove that the name is unique, because Wikipedia is a work in progress to which new articles can be added at any time. We require documented proof that people have actually researched whether the place properly qualifies for the page move or not, and the only way we can do that is to have a discussion on the talk page so that we have a permanent record of the process. Please read WP:CANSTYLE, which makes it quite clear that the Canadian naming convention requires a move discussion in advance of a page move except in the most extraordinarily obvious circumstances. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no point disambiguating it if there's no other article. All it takes is a simple Google search anyway. All the results are for the one in Quebec. RandySavageFTW (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Then the discussion can be pretty much pro forma — but the rule for moving Canadian places to the undisambiguated title is that there needs to be a discussion first. For one thing, until such a discussion has actually taken place we would have no documented proof that anybody has done a Google search on the name. Bearcat (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Move request
Palmarolle, Quebec → Palmarolle &mdash; Name appears to be unique; plain title is a redirect. Note that this is a procedural nomination, bringing back into process a move that was already performed — accordingly, I have no opinion. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Support move. Appears to meet WP:PRIMARYUSAGE and WP:CANSTYLE.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)