Talk:Palmerston Park

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Palmerston Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917025553/http://qosfc.com/AboutQueens/QueensLegends/tabid/115/Default.aspx to http://qosfc.com/AboutQueens/QueensLegends/tabid/115/Default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917025553/http://qosfc.com/AboutQueens/QueensLegends/tabid/115/Default.aspx to http://qosfc.com/AboutQueens/QueensLegends/tabid/115/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright issue requested to be waived for edit
The link added was in extra as given in welcome tutorial as is of news / public genre. Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi again . The problem is that all Wikipedia content is immediately and permanently given away to anyone anywhere to use, re-use, change, sell, or whatever they want to do with it (as long as they just link back to Wikipedia). If the added text is copyrighted, then we don't have that right; we can't give away content we don't own. So any text added here has to be already free before it's added. In the case of this page, the footballgroundguide website clearly asserts a copyright so our hands are tied. We can't waive the copyright issue. The only thing that can be done is if the footballgroundguide site wishes to release that text under a free license.


 * That said, if you re-write the content in your own words, using the web site as a source for Facts, but using your own words, then we don't have a copyright problem since facts themselves can't be copyrighted. So imagine you were explaining the park to a friend and write the content that way. Just don't use the words that the web site used and you'll be fine. CrowCaw 21:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Fair Enough. As suggested will redraft the fact, concise and precise ! Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)