Talk:Pam Hupp

Use of “it’s”
Hi Wikipedia People: why did you note “sic” after two uses of the word “it’s” in the section on the death of Pam Hupp’s mother (reference was an anonymous note)? From my understanding of English punctuation, “it’s” (meaning “it is”) was used correctly in that context. The mix-up between “it’s” and “its” (the latter being the possessive form) always sticks in my craw. Thanks for reading this. Sincerely, Lisa Bobbie Schreiber Hughes 2601:152:C80:9930:8878:A1DE:C8E5:1B9A (talk) 03:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

wasnt there a first husband?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DgTI9_jGPg&list=WL&index=2&t=309s 82.69.56.17 (talk) 22:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Currency conversion
Does every single mention of a dollar amount have to include a purchasing power adjustment? It's distracting because the differences are so negligible (e.g., $2,000,000 vs $2,094,000), and are they that important for context, given the reasons for the subject's notability? These civil judgements are less than five years old. Matuko (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * - from my perspective I am happy for you to remove them when you feel they are not helpful. Personally I think the values of the life insurance policy values in "Death of Betsy Faria" are helpful to include. McPhail (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding. I agree that the amounts which relate directly to motive of crime or crimes should remain. I just don't think all of them do. I'm also cognizant that for future readers they might one day be useful for context, and that's why they were included, which is laudable. It's a very good article that captures the complexity of the case. —Matuko (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)