Talk:Pamela Turnure

NPOV ain't easy.
There is one broken link to an article in _The National Review_ that is not specifically "calling into question" this claim, nor even "calling into question" this book, but instead is about the early life and origins of the author (Seymour Hersh) justifying the dismissive statement, "The credibility of The Dark Side of Camelot was called into question immediately after its 1997 publication." The specific claim in question here (and its salience to this wikipedia article) rests on empirically verifiable "hard facts" with multiple witnesses: photographs, audio recordings, and interviews with multiple people who saw and heard what happened directly. NPOV would not end the paragraph with such a dismissive statement citing an irrelevant article (as a whole, not a specific counter-claim within it). Stating that the whole book has been "called into question" is insufficient here; Hersh is not immune to criticism, but he is one of the most lauded and award winning authors of the last hundred years. 16:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 2001:569:BEF5:1700:ACC6:A076:925C:83F6 (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)