Talk:Pan-Blue Coalition

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.lien.org.tw/English/i0803.asp
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Sun Jul 16 21:32:20 2006, Socket Error: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Mon Jul 17 17:56:29 2006, Socket Error: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Thu Jul 27 01:26:33 2006, Socket Error: (-2, 'Name or service not known')

maru  (talk)  contribs 05:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.kmt.org.tw/Aboutus/English/Aboutus-12-8.html
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Sun Jul 16 21:32:28 2006, 404 Not Found
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Mon Jul 17 17:56:29 2006, 404 Not Found
 * In Pan-Blue Coalition on Thu Jul 27 01:26:34 2006, 404 Object Not Found

maru  (talk)  contribs 05:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kmtpfp.gif
Image:Kmtpfp.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Union of Chinese Nationalists site
An anon has removed the ext link to the Union of Chinese Nationalists website, with the snotty comment, "dunno if u know that china is not a democracy". It was my impression that UoCN was a proper ext link because it was a group of mainland Chinese who generally agreed with the Pan-Blue Coalition. See Articles for deletion/Union of Chinese Nationalists for further discussion. I don't read Chinese, though, so I can't be sure of that. On my talk page, the anon wrote, "I just dont see how a web page designed by a chinese (PRC, not ROC) has anything to do with taiwanese parties..." If it's designed by people in the PRC who are trying to further the goals of the people in the ROC, and the PRC-based designers see themselves as allies of the Pan-Blue Coalition, then I think it's relevant, regardless of the state of democracy in the PRC. JamesMLane t c 08:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pan-Blue Coalition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050223010242/http://english.www.gov.tw/index.jsp?id=11 to http://english.www.gov.tw/index.jsp?id=11&recid=103953&viewdate=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Paradoxical political views
This political alliance has paradoxical points of view, the consider themselves "anti-communist" and the same time they want to be part of China, a communist state.

A paradox, isn´t it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.24.96.246 (talk) 10:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

This article shouldn't be deleted without discussion
seems to think that they can clandestinely blank and redirect this article without discussion. Remember that you need to reach a consensus beforehand. Add this article to WP:AFD if you truly think this should be deleted instead of blanking the page and redirecting it to Kuomintang. There are other parties in the Pan-Blue Coalition such as the New Party. Add references to this page if you think there aren't enough references. Jakkco1 (talk) 04:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)