Talk:Pan-Serbism

Untitled
Who wrote this ridiculous article?

There is no such 'pan-serbism' term, and uneducational, suggestive tone in which this article is wrote, with the fact that it holds several shalow lies and misinterpretations, gives me an impression that this is wrote by a member of some of the nations Serbs fought against during the '90: so, it is not fair, objective and unprejudiced.

For example, "Pan-Serbism was simply an Anger against centuries of Turkish rule": first, you have some traits of nationalistic ideology at least in the begining of 13th century, when Saint Sava declared Serbs as New Israel, or new God's People; this particular fact is mentioned by various authors during the middle ages, before Turks came [and, of course, Stephan Nemanja, the father of Saint Sava, declared that duty of his posterity should be 'One People, One State']. Last [but not the least], a word 'Anger' is written 'anger'. Uneducational and suggestive tone.

Then, "Ilija Garašanin replaced all the "Slav" with "Serb" in the Pan-Slavism-Ideology and a Serbian-Nationalist movement was made": This ofcourse, also, is uneducational and suggestive tone. Ilija Garasanin, havent replaced nothing, and [considering only general idea of 'all Serbian state', because the work of Ilija Garasanin is like a textbook for Serbian foreign policy] he just syntetized and wrote on paper what generations of folk singers [guslari], serdars and hajduks through 400 years created in the minds of entire nation, from Military Krajina in Austria to the Macedonia in the south.

And, just one more, "Repulsed by Austria, who hoped to drive them away from Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Serbs commenced by directing their efforts towards the south, on the Bulgarian border. Crushed by the Bulgars in 1885, they took their revenge in 1913": this particular shows the strongest suggestive tone of all. Serbia atacked the Bulgaria because Bulgaria was demolishing The Treaty of Berlin, the same one in which Austro-Hungaria gained Bosnia [after Serbs succesfully after Nevesinje Uprising 'sent Turks home'] for rule [by the wish of big powers, especialy England's Prime Minister Disraely]. It was a stupid mistake by King Milan, who ran pro-Austrian policy and was disliked by the people for that [he signed a treaty with Austria, telling them he abdicate of all Serbian territories on Austrian soil]. So, the motivation for 1885 was not some kind of 'pan-serbism', but King Milan's vanity. And, 1913. was the year of Second Balkan War in which also Greece and Romania [besides the two serbian states, Serbia and Montenegro] waged agains Bulgaria because Bulgaria acted against the spirit of Little Antanta, later admited by its contemporary King, just for interests of Germania [he was German, infact].

I ask this article to be deleted, therefore.


 * I agree. This article is childish, amateurish and absurd.Stanimir (talk)

Serbs are a nation
You might as well merge it with Serb Nationalism/Irredentism because it's the same damn article, this is as retarded as calling American patriotism "Pan-Americanism". Whoever made this article is mentally challenged or something. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Merge into Greater Serbia article
This article involves the same subject matter covered in the article Greater Serbia. There is no need for a separate article for this topic.--R-41 (talk) 21:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Let's do it.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)